On hiatus: I’ll be wrapping up my current submissions and taking a break for a bit. This was more popular than I expected so when I return, it’s likely I’ll probably add a payment caveat.
It seems there’s been a little interest in this, so here it goes.
I am opening a “critique” shop here for you to introduce me to your work. The first 500-600 words of your manuscript are critical when you’re trying to attract new readers or query and catch the attention of an agent/editor/publisher. I’d like to help you perfect them.
What you’ll be doing:
- I’m only taking on 5 at a time right now (sign up for slots in the wiki below. I will clear them as I finish them). I will add a waiting list area and move people around depending on how much interest there is and tag you when it’s your turn. It would be best if you don’t post your excerpts until I’ve tagged you, just for the sake of keeping the thread neat. I won’t be annoyed if you do, it just may get pushed back a while before I get to it.
- If you’re in one of the numbered slots, go ahead and post your excerpt.
- Post the first ~600 words of your work in this thread. It doesn’t have to be exactly 600 words, and if you get cut off in the middle of a scene, feel free to fudge that number a little to get to a stopping point that makes sense. You can choose to use the “Details” function or not, doesn’t matter to me.
- I’m not asking for payment right now (that’s right, I’m doing it for “free”), but that might change in the future. However, if you sign up for a critique while I’m offering free critiques and I then decide to start asking for payment, you won’t be expected to do one.
- Run your work through Grammarly or something similar first. I don’t want to offer this service for the purpose of pointing out misspellings or punctuation issues. Grammarly is really good at catching that stuff. If I see your excerpt hasn’t even been proofread, I will kick it back to you to fix before I critique it. That doesn’t mean if you miss a comma or misspel one word (see what I did there?) I’ll kick it back right away, but more than a couple and I will.
What I’ll be critiquing:
- First and foremost, your hook. The hook is so critical to drawing in a reader. Why should I continue to read your story after the first 600 words?
- Story flow, including infodumps and the dreaded “show don’t tell.”
- Word, style, and dialogue choices. Writing is an art, despite how many rules surround it, so some of your wording may be a stylistic choice, but I will offer my thoughts and impressions here too. If something seems clunky in its wording, I’ll point it out and possibly offer an alternative.
- Grammar and formatting. Yeah, if I see some weird grammar thing that Grammarly didn’t pick up, I’ll mention it.
- “Other.” If something else catches my attention, I’ll comment on it. It’s not limited to just the items above.
Why my critiques will benefit you:
- I’ve been doing this a long time. I’ve had my work both praised and rejected by a variety of editors and agents and professionals. I’ve rewritten my own novel several times to ensure it’s the best it can be and know what the most common pitfalls are, especially in those first crucial pages. And yes, I’ve self-published, too.
- I’ve studied (and own) the Chicago Manual of Style. If I’m unsure of the appropriate/standard for something grammatically or in formatting, I have the “bible” of the publishing world available at my fingertips to double-check and confirm what is correct.
- My experience both professionally and educationally has trained me in the art of writing–in multiple ways, not just fiction.
- I’ve been critiquing online works for a long time.
Got this far? Good. Here’s the extra fine print.
- I will be blunt. Blunt does not mean cruel, but I will point out things with a constructively critical eye. This means you may get criticism, and it might feel mean. You need to brace yourself for this. I openly admit that many things in writing are artistic choices, but you must be open to feedback. I will do my best not to ruin your day.
- The critiques will be public. I will post them in this thread for the purposes of other users seeing my previous advice and to keep track of whose work I’ve already looked over.
- I have no restrictions on content. However, for the sake of other users who may be following along, be sure to mark your excerpt with appropriate trigger or maturity warnings.
- Be patient.
- Run your stuff through Grammarly or a similar service before you post it. Yes, it’s important enough that I mentioned it twice. If I read over an excerpt that’s not been, at the very least, proofread, I will tell you to fix that before moving forward with the critique.
- If I critique your work and you’d like me to read over it again once you’ve edited, I will do so. You will be added to the rotation.
Still want to enter the dragon’s den? Go for it and good luck.
Common Advice I Give
These are a handful of things I seem to say a lot, so consider them before/when you submit:
-
Your opening scene(s) should be the event (or at least the lead-up) that changes the direction of your characters’ lives - aka the “catalyst”. Their lives have been normal and boring until this thing happens. This event will generally establish a change in the norm, and often, at least some kind of conflict/suspense.
-
Let us get to know your characters. If at the end of the 600 words we don’t know anything more about your character than we did when we started reading, we’re probably not going to continue. What they’re doing is not the same thing as who they are.
-
A hook is not the same thing as your plot. This took me a long time to understand. But just because your opening scene should establish conflict and/or suspense doesn’t mean you have to introduce your antagonist right away. Give us a little mystery to make us keep turning the pages…but don’t leave everything so ambiguous that we don’t have any more insight into your novel than we did when we started reading.
-
If you’re going to introduce an object of importance, don’t do it in the first 600 words unless you’re going to immediately explain why it’s important. That trinket or book or keepsake or article of clothing that has so much impact later does not need to be mentioned here. Your reader will forget about it, I promise. Don’t waste words on an object that’s clearly important only to not tell us why it’s important in the first 600 words. As much as you’re hoping it’ll build suspense about the object, all it does is make your reader ask why you brought it up at all.
-
Worldbuilding and description is great…just not in your first 600 words. Obviously, there are some exceptions to this, but if you’re spending precious words waxing poetic about the environment, the city, the weather, the surrounding people…that leaves us less time to get to know your character. That doesn’t mean do the opposite and completely ignore where your character is, thus confusing us about where your story is happening. But you can often save your worldbuilding and exposition for later. Weave it in and out of conversation. If you dump several paragraphs of information on us, we’re going to get lost and/or skim and/or skip it. But if you add a sentence here, a comment there, about the world your character lives in, it’s going to be much more immersive. In your first 600 words, give us just enough to set the scene and understand where your character is. Then jump into what’s actually happening. You’ll have plenty of time to introduce your world to us, I promise.
-
A storm rumbled over the roof of the leaky barn.
The 5 o’clock traffic was at a complete standstill.
The sun beat down on the white sands of the tropical beach.
-
-
Ask yourself, REALLY ask yourself, if the opening scene is where your story starts. A lot of the time, it’s about a chapter too early. Take some time to think about what’s going to hook your reader and make them keep reading. What is it that makes your story, your characters, your world more interesting than the others out there, and why should your reader keep reading to find out?